Welcome

Conspiracy Theories

To me, the most frustrating thing about proponents of conspiracy theories is that there is usually no way to reason a sincere believer out of one. They are not objectively looking for truth, or there would be greater success with this approach. I suspect that conspiracy theories meet some deep emotional or psychological need, and the person will cling to beliefs that meet that need rather than accept evidence that disproves their belief.

I’m fond of saying, “Nothing will change my mind faster than data.” I’ve been swayed on several big things over the years, and it was all after research and reflection. So, I’m confident that I usually approach things with an open mind and am willing to look at the evidence. But there has to be hard evidence. Conversely, with die-hard conspiracy fans, they stop with, “Nothing will change my mind.”

I have three main issues with conspiracy theories:

      1. There is No Useful Action to Take
        There is never a clear, actionable solution to “the problem.” But, there are plenty of verifiable problems in the world that could use some fixing. Why not focus on those, instead? Conspiracy theories are just distractions that keep otherwise well-intentioned people from giving energy to meaningful change.

      2. They Feed Negative Energy
        All “conspiracies” feed on fear and mistrust. They emotionally validate the person’s assumption that there is some shadowy cabal at work, some nefarious organization to fight. It’s been said that “truth is stranger than fiction,” and people will often create a fiction in order to explain a strange truth.

      3. Surface-Level Thinking
        In my experience, people who buy into conspiracy theories tend to take what they read or hear at face value as long as it supports the narrative. They assume that the information they are given is accurate and complete, trusting that someone else has done “all this research,” but they, themselves, they don’t dig deeper to ask questions that unravel the claims. I’ll be honest — I find this very exasperating. Especially when poking holes in the claims doesn’t sway their conviction.

    If you’re a friend of mine reading this, you can ask to use me as a sounding board for a conspiracy theory that you are considering. I may be up to helping with that. But, don’t expect me to do the research for you. What I will do is ask questions that you can then go dig deeper into and see if there’s a viable answer or if it leads to a dead end. I’m happy to help you get better at critical thinking. I’m not going to do all of the research and thinking for you.

    xkcd has a great comic that sums up my thoughts really well…

    Real World Impact

    If conspiracy theories were just some harmless hobby, they wouldn’t bother me as much. But there are real world impacts if people in positions of power and authority believe them. (This includes voters.)

    A prime example is Donald Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was stolen. After the dust settled from that election, there were many independent (and not so independent) investigations into claims of widespread election fraud. None of them uncovered any widespread efforts to “steal” the election. This includes a deep dive conducted by the Republican-led state legislature in Arizona. At the end of their research, they discovered that there were even more votes for Biden than in the initial tally.

    There will always be individuals who try to cheat. But that is different than claims of a conspiracy among several people, or an entire organization entrusted with ensuring free and fair elections for people legally allowed to vote.

    But Donald Trump has a large following, and he convinced a lot of people that there was a conspiracy that resulted in a “stolen election.” He railed against vote by mail. He railed against election laws. He railed against anything that he could point to besides his own failed bid.

    So, what happened? Republican legislators across the country pushed for changes to the election system. While some of these changes are good and necessary, some of them are a step backwards in election security and accessibility.

    I would say that an even bigger problem is the number of citizens who called or wrote to election workers with threats of violence. I worked in a county clerk office when this happened. Note that I lived in a Republican-dominated county, and the county clerk was a Republican. But this clerk knew that Utah’s election process was sound, and he didn’t jump on the election fraud bandwagon. His car was vandalized twice. Workers in our elections office received threats.

    This happened nationwide.

    The result is that many elections workers decided that it just wasn’t worth it. They’re process administrators, not martyrs for a cause.

    So, what happened? They quit. They retired. They didn’t run for office again.

    In Utah, 2/3 of our experienced elections officials quit. Nationwide, that number is probably 40%.

    What do you think happened next? What that much experience exits, it leaves a vacuum. And who do you think replaced that experience? With a voter base who is up in arms about election fraud?

    They were replaced by fellow election deniers who are convinced that the current system is corrupt and they have to create a better way.

    What you have then are elections that make it harder for valid voters to have their vote counted. You have elections that are even more susceptible to fraud.

    In Utah county, for example, (a county that is about as red as it gets), the Lieutenant Governor’s audit of the 2024 primary election found that the elections office rejected voter signatures at a rate five times higher than the state average. That means five times as many voters had to jump through additional hoops in order to have their vote count.

    In addition, because this county clerk tries to undermine and circumvent voting by mail at every opportunity, he created a new “fast cast” system where a voter can bring their mail-in ballot to a polling location and have it be scanned and counted on the spot. The problem is that, in order to do this, they had to disable security features in the scanning machine, because the system isn’t designed to allow that. The result? The audit discovered 19 votes that were improperly counted.

    From the report:

    The fast cast voting process as implemented in the 2024 primary election lacked key statutory controls and created an environment where fraudulent and/or unauthorized ballots were cast.

    This is the real world impact of conspiracy theories when enough people buy into them.

    Clarifications

    There is a difference between “conspiracy” and “conspiracy theory.”

    From the Merriam Webster online dictionary:

    A conspiracy is:

    1the act of conspiring together
    They were accused of conspiracy to commit murder.
     
    2aan agreement among conspirators
    uncovered a conspiracy against the government
     
    ba group of conspirators
    conspiracy made up of disgruntled aristocrats
     
     
    And conspiring is:
    1ato join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement
    accused of conspiring to overthrow the government
    conspired to monopolize and restrict trade
     
     
    Whereas a conspiracy theory is:
    a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators
    the conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s assassination
     
    also a theory asserting that a secret of great importance is being kept from the public
    … is best known for … his conspiracy theory that a secret cabal of reptilian humanoids is running the world.Simon Little
    … has often been criticized for promoting conspiracy theories such as “birtherism,” the theory that President Obama was not born in the U.S.Grace Segers
     
     
    Conspiracies are a thing. They happen. But, just because conspiracies exist does not mean that a conspiracy theory is valid.